Taking into account the regime of the state contract, the following indicators were proposed to measure the effectiveness of the concurrence as a concept of general interest and the concurrence from the perspective of the principle of equality in the definitive specifications, without putting the risk at risk. celebration and execution of the state contract that is intended to be concluded with the public tender, of the target population identified in this document:
FREEDOM OF CONCURRENCY Firstly, the document “closing act” or in its absence “the administrative act of awarding the contract” is reviewed, in order to verify the concurrence of the process. It is necessary to clarify that the current regulation establishes that it is legally valid that in accordance with the provisions of article 126.96.36.199.2.2.6 of Decree 1082 of 2015, it is not considered a ground for declaring a tender void if a single proposal is presented , as long as it complies with the qualifying requirements and with the requirements contained in the specifications.
ECONOMIC BENEFIT As we recorded in the first chapter1 this author developing the principles that govern the public tender maintains that it is a procedure that aims to select the most compelling and advantageous offer insisting that it has the best price, in terms of quality and economy relation.
For its part Marienhoff has established that the tender has its raison d’être in which, through this procedure, the Public Administration guarantees the possibility of obtaining better economic conditions (inasmuch as the bid between the bidders to obtain the bid may allow some offers more favorable economic conditions for the state entity).